He details the work of several well known composers (Beethoven, Mozart) and some lesser known ones (Schumann, Liszt, Brahms) to expose how true music should be made. He says their works conveyed passion and intricate thought processes, but they were also accessible to the public.
In Joy H. Calico's "Hans Eisler, Marxist Polygot," she examines Eisler's strides in going off of the example he was given by his predecessors. Eisler differed in his music by the message he conveyed: his music reflected his Marxist ideology. This made his music political. Calico describes his ideas as controversial, as she notes many universities' attempt at an Eisler ban in classes, but she stresses how important Eisler is in understanding music. She talks about Eisler as a "polygot" meaning that he can alternate and balance his musical genius with creating tunes that are accessible to a casual fan. She references "To A Little Radio" (which we listened to in class) as a great example for exemplifying this balance.
I found it interesting how the concerns Eisler presented about music (music for the sake of music without meaning) are still extremely prevalent in today's music scene.
I've especially noticed "music for the sake of music" in popular country music. Gone are the days of Garth Brooks and George Strait, when the leaders of the genre told stories about life that related to the listener. Even modern-day storytellers in country music like Eric Church are taking a backseat to artists like Florida Georgia Line and Luke Bryan, literally known for making songs about bars and trucks without much substance.
Take a look at the lyrics from "This Is How We Roll" by Florida Georgia Line featuring Luke Bryan (yes, these two artists collaborated to make one of the worst country songs of the last decade):
"The mixtape's got a little Hank, little Drake
A little something bumping, thump, thumping on the wheel rideThe mix in our drink's a little stronger than you think
So get a grip, take a sip of that feel right
The truck's jacked up, flatbed's flipped back
Yeah, you can find us where the party's at"
Notice how nothing happens in these lyrics. We're given no context to where they are or who they are interacting with, only that there is a truck and alcohol present. We aren't even told "where the party's at." We are told from there that "this is how [they] roll" in the chorus. Once again, this gives little information into what that even means.
Compare that to the lyrics Eric Church's "A Man Who Was Gonna Die Young":
"I like fast cars and sharp dreams
Chased a lot of crazy thingsLeft behind my share of broken pieces
This morning I turned 36,
When you just remember half of it
You wonder how you outlived Hank and Jesus
[Chorus]
I put the rage in a river, the roll in a thunder
But you kept me from goin' under,
When that current got too heavy
I always thought I'd be a heap of metal
In a cloud of smoke, foot stuck to the pedal
Sold for parts like a junkyard rusted-out Chevy
Fear, I've had none
What the hell made you wanna love
A man who was gonna die young"
The lyrics draw interesting imagery. Church mentions his love for fast cars and then uses that to construct a metaphor of the crazy lifestyle of his younger days. He continues the metaphor, saying he expected his life to be similar to a broken down Chevy. The song shows profound reflection on his life, as he questions how his wife could love a man as broken as him. And for some reason, in today's pop culture, true, pensive lyrics like this can't gain the same popularity as "the mix in our drank's a little stronger than you thank." It's crazy. I know these examples are far from political, but they still illustrate the points that Eisler outlined in his essay.
Florida Georgia Line's "This Is How We Roll":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1v0_oozGz0w
Eric Church's "A Man Who Was Gonna Die Young":